A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between prospective neighbours in excess of the construction of a wall at a coastal site within a north Dublin suburb, a case which has attracted countrywide consideration following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family members household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of organizing breaches, environmental considerations, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier along with the Irish Periods short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building is effective at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, seek to develop their household home. The case has become emblematic of wider disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, exactly where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. According to the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being manufactured by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below setting up authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their arranging permission by building a wall over and above the boundaries of their web site, resulting in an encroachment on the Specific Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as a result areas are topic to rigid controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments might have lasting ecological consequences, specifically inside of a delicate coastal surroundings like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partially designed, is in the correct place. Their authorized workforce has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful growth. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so as to preserve their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal scheduling disputes, where by sights of the sea are both of those remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced in the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-large h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image which includes given that turn out to be emblematic of the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they have been meant to Collect visual evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions documented, describing how The 2 men entered the water all through extreme weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the site turned Among the most striking descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that this kind of steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall extended into an area influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up protected in detail via the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as readers sought to know the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read additional submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial moment during the authorized timeline.
With the core with the dispute is usually a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as made, goes past what was authorised and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been described as meticulous in his assessment of planning files, maps, and disorders connected for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their motion is enthusiastic by issue for environmental defense and adherence to planning law. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A personal look at, insisting alternatively that it's about making certain that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got explained their prolonged-standing link to the realm and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair basically endeavoring to make a loved ones home in accordance While using the law. They deny the wall encroaches on a Distinctive Place of Conservation and say that every one performs are already carried out based on Qualified tips and accepted designs. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes moving into the sea for the duration of a storm, don't change the underlying information.
The case has also lifted broader questions about how setting up disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times neighbours in bitter court dispute above construction of wall at coastal site is becoming a shorthand description to get a problem that a lot of observers see as increasingly typical. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation amongst non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats has started to become much more contentious.
The Irish Instances posting about René Collier mentioned which the businessman experienced previously been linked to neighborhood advocacy on scheduling and environmental concerns, while not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from very various Expert backgrounds can find on their own aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Moments coverage emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by midsection-superior drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods and René Collier waded as a result of waistline-high water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Moments are phrases that appeared frequently in protection, reflecting equally the Actual physical fact on the coastline as well as the symbolic mother nature on the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these actions shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal approach.
As being the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome stays uncertain. The court docket need to figure out whether the wall as built complies with preparing authorization and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has happened. The legal arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and planning disorders. Nonetheless the human aspect remains central: neighbours who will have to Dwell along with one another long following the authorized fees are actually paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case extend further than that address. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the necessity of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition it underscores how quickly a local disagreement can escalate when basic concerns for example environmental safety and property rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of purely natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre with the dispute stands partly created, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal issues. Irrespective of whether it can in the end be altered, taken off, or done as prepared will depend upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible proceed to seem in headlines, linked indelibly to Among the most carefully viewed planning disputes in north Dublin recently.